Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
WHAT CONNECTS TV licences, the Epstein files and an unfortunately timed mobile phone going off?
All three featured in interruptions by spectators who were subsequently ejected from the World Snooker Championship last weekend at the Crucible Theatre in Sheffield, a venue considered the sport’s Mecca.
I saw them all happen while spending the weekend watching the culmination of the tournament with one eye on the table and another on my phone.
If you’ve ever watched even two minutes of snooker, you’ll know the audience behaves a bit differently compared to people you see at other live sporting events, who tend to be referred to as ‘crowds’.
At almost every snooker event, total silence is expected while the players are at the table, and there is no greater taboo among spectators than creating a distraction, inadvertent or otherwise.
The sport is almost anti-internet in its rhythms: matches unfold quietly and patiently, and are enjoyed through dedicated concentration rather than constant stimulation.
Silence isn’t always paramount, but even still, it was highly unusual to see two high-profile pieces of attention-seeking behaviour inspired by the online world manifest at pivotal moments during the latter stages of the sport’s showcase event.
The incidents were symbolic of a culture where public events have become opportunities for self-insertion and online visibility and showed how the logic of social media can spill into the few public spaces where etiquette usually prevents it happening.
The first was a disruption that came during a tense final frame in the semi-final between Northern Ireland’s Mark Allen and eventual champion Wu Yize on Saturday night.
After Allen played a shot and returned to his seat, one spectator stood up and broke the silence with shouts of “never forget the Epstein files” and “unredact the Epstein files” – calls that were likely inspired by the vast array of conspiracy theories around the death of paedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein in 2019.
The person responsible was subsequently removed from the venue, but their weird interjection managed to live on through clips of the incident that appeared on platforms in the minutes afterwards.
As soon as that footage appeared online, it transformed what happened from an awkward live moment into a piece of internet content with a much larger audience.
An even more bizarre spectacle came during the opening session of the final the following afternoon, when a woman mounted the barrier separating fans from players and shouted “who the fuck pays their TV licence” before she was physically removed.
She turned out to be an OnlyFans model who subsequently posted a video about the incident in which she admitted responsibility and urged people to visit her page on X.
The incongruous moment wasn’t intended for people inside the Crucible at all, but for the much larger TV audience and those waiting online afterwards.
These incidents are anomalies in snooker, and the only comparable disruption in recent times was when a Just Stop Oil protester at the same event in 2023 jumped into the playing area and stopped a match by covering a table in orange powder.
This year’s disruptions seem to be more evidence of the rise in social rule-bending that I’ve previously written about that happens when the physical world is confronted by people whose brains have become overly wired to the online attention economy.
In both cases, the ends justified the means: clips, posts and news articles detailing what happened soon appeared online, where they were promoted to me by the algorithm as much as what was actually happening on the table in the hours afterwards.
Of course, it’s likely that this happened precisely because they were anomic events and were therefore more likely to generate engagement and get people talking.
That counts even more when you consider that snooker’s slower rhythm makes it unusually susceptible to second-screen culture; its pace practically invites interstitial browsing as you’re watching it on a couch.
Matches are played over several hours with semi-frequent breaks in play, which are ideal for checking and posting on social media, where it’s easy to find televised clips of individual shots – and interruptions – minutes after they happen.
That kind of content also enables what is a pretty niche sport, whose audiences have dwindled in recent decades, to break through into mainstream feeds when big moments happen.
Minutes before the Epstein files interruption, Mark Allen failed to pot a match-winning black ball that would have sent him into his first world final, an excruciating miss that subsequently went viral.
As someone more inside the tent when it comes to snooker content, I also found it interesting as I watched the tournament how much X’s algorithm continued its usual habit of surfacing negative comments about what was happening into my feed.
It was another reminder that online platforms optimise for emotional intensity rather than enjoyment.
While there were plenty of posts showing brilliant shots or commenting on excellent play, I also saw plenty of others giving out about commentators or complaining about semi-visible lines on the table distracting viewers.
Even when I was using X simply to enjoy snooker discourse, the platform kept feeding me complaints, nit-picking and ragebait, because frustration travels online as much as appreciation does.
The Crucible still mostly feels like an anachronism in the internet age, as a place where spectators sit quietly compared to the online world that rewards interruption, visibility and outrage above almost everything else.
One wonders how long spaces like that will last.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
have your say